During the International Builders’ Show in Orlando I participated in the National Leadership Conference hosted by Custom Builders USA, a national custom builders buying group. CBUSA strives to obtain better pricing for its builder members by doing local and national group buying and negotiating volume builder prices from its suppliers and subcontractors.
One of the subjects in the meeting that hit close to my heart was a discussion about how difficult it has been to obtain comparable bids due to inadequate information provided to partners. Since the discussion revolved around builder plans with no mention of specifications, it became clear to me the genesis of the problem was inadequate specifications. When I raised the question about project specifications, all 20-plus builders agreed there were typically large gaps and insufficient information in the specs, plans and scope of work provided by architects.
The group decided the remedy was to take it upon themselves to create their own scope of work. All agreed that strong specifications lead to improved and more competitive bidding. What was transpiring in that room is what occurs across the country on a daily basis. Builders, suppliers and subcontractors are stuck with an inadequate set of plans and specifications, and they take it upon themselves to complete the unfinished work of the architect. This can only result in time and money wasted for the owner. It will also create confusion on the job when everyone but the project architect is filling in the scope of work.
I am sure many residential architects have heard from builder team members: “Don’t worry about the specs; I’ll take care of it.” How many times have you seen the words “as specified” on builder plans only to find nothing referenced in the minimum pages of specs largely filled with allowance amounts?
Residential architects need to get deep into the subject of specifications, become more knowledgeable and provide the service that is inherent to the profession. We need to move away from the builder-set mentality that the builder will figure it out.
I have personally not found a good single source for residential specifications. I have followed my own devices, utilizing different resources starting with the Construction Specifications Institute. Though CSI deals mostly with commercial and institutional, I have found its 16 divisions of work form a good skeleton upon which to organize my information.
The best advisors for creating a good set of specifications and scope of work are your network and associations. At the end of the day, however, it should fall on the architect to compile all the information and provide it to our clients. We all should consider this to be intrinsic to our profession and to the services we provide.
Move beyond allowances
Another factor that becomes the enemy of a good specifications set, and greatly diminishes effective comparable bidding, is the insidious use of allowances. Allowances open the door for others to figure out what the heck we’re
supposed to be building and relieves the architect of being burdened with too much specificity. Unfortunately, it seems to be a concept builders are happy with because it allows them latitude in the interpretation of the construction documents.
Delve into the endeavor of improving your specifications, and minimize or discard all of your allowances. Use your network to compare and improve your in-house specifications, then share it within your industry network. This way we all can operate in a world of abundant information and reliable competitive pricing from our suppliers and subcontractors.